“Undoubtedly there are, in connection with each of these things, cases of fraud, swindling, and other financial crimes; that is to say, the greed and selfishness of men are perpetual.”
“exposé ~ noun
1.a public exposure or revelation, as of something discreditable:
Certain cheap magazines make a fortune out of sensational exposés.”
*NB: For those of you who are not familiar with the whole debacle, or who need a refresher, I suggest you read the following first, from number one onwards:
So having familiarised yourself with the truth of this issue – and hopefully understanding what exactly is the truth here – read on…
First – here’s a SC for you to read – note in particular the date this was posted. Keep that in mind.
Those of you who know this person, will know her book – which she wrote under the name of Rochelle Moore – was removed from publication for plagiarism . Ergo, anything she writes is questionable. Bare that in mind, while reading this SC – again, note the date (bottom left) and compare the entry for Aries…
Now tell me thats right?
How can the very same horoscope be relevant for 2017 as it was for 2015?
In 2015, Mars, which rules Aries, was in Aquarius … see below:
In 2017, Mars begins the year in the sign of the fish – Pisces – see above.
Even to an amateur, it is clear that two horoscopes are NEVER the same two years apart, if at all.
Ergo, I conclude with a question; how can this be right?
Is this a mistake?
Somehow I doubt it, but if it does, comments are open for Whelan to exercise her right to reply.
But there is a deeper, sightly disturbing feeling to this – please, go check via the links to see for yourself, how Whelan has posted this old material across the social networks she uses, from Google+ (SC above) to Twitter …
…to Facebook and many many more.
Is this morally right?
Think about it – not only is it misinformation, is it also disrespect?
By doing this, she must have looked at the possibility of discovery – does she really think that her readers would NOT notice?
She thinks they are that easy to fool?
Does she really think that she can con people into thinking she is a trustworthy person?
Is she feeding on that need that vulnerable people have?
Is the issue here a blatant lack of respect?
Is this a con?
I will leave you to draw your own conclusion, dear reader.
Here’s what I see.
I see a person who has no respect for the community they prey on.